Great conversation about the need for science in psychology training programs

I'll be adding a new post in a bit, but I wanted to call your attention to the great conversation unfolding in the comment section of our recent article on whether or not universities should be required to build their psychology training around science (Seth Gitter currently has my favorite comment of the bunch).  I don't want this conversation to stall, so my hope is that readers will continue to add their own thoughts, experiences, and opinions.  You should not feel shy about adding contrasting views. In my opinion, this conversation is remarkably important, so let's see if we can keep it going here.

To add your thoughts, click on this link, scroll down to the bottom of the article, and write your comment.  All comments are sent to me before they get published, so when you submit, it will simply disappear for a bit until I stumble upon it in my inbox and set it up to be published.